Mali vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Mali
0.0005 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0004 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
159th
Namibia rank
162nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Mali
  • Namibia
0000.001199020062023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.0005 million t per square kilometre against 0.0004 million t per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 159th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 200 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Mali
2000s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Mali
2010s 0.0005 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mali
2020s 0.0005 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Mali or Namibia?
Mali, at 0.0005 million t per square kilometre against 0.0004 million t per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Mali and Namibia?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Mali ranks 159th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/">Mali vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.