Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Malta
0.0001 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
182nd
Saudi Arabia rank
185th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Saudi Arabia
0000199020062023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0 million t per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.9 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 182nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 185th of 200 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0001 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Malta or Saudi Arabia?
Malta, at 0.0001 million t per square kilometre against 0 million t per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Malta and Saudi Arabia?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saudi Arabia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Malta and Saudi Arabia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 182nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 185th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/malta/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/malta/saudi-arabia/">Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.