Marshall Islands vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Marshall Islands
0.0051 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.0053 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Marshall Islands rank
37th
East Timor rank
34th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • East Timor
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.0053 million t per square kilometre against 0.0051 million t per square kilometre in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 33 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 37th and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0049 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0.0049 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.005 million t per square kilometre 0.0054 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0051 million t per square kilometre 0.0053 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Marshall Islands or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.0053 million t per square kilometre against 0.0051 million t per square kilometre in Marshall Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Marshall Islands and East Timor?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and East Timor?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Marshall Islands and East Timor rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Marshall Islands ranks 37th and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/marshall-islands/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/marshall-islands/timor-leste/">Marshall Islands vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.