Mauritius vs Norway: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0014 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0013 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
115th
Norway rank
117th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Norway
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 115th and Norway ranks 117th of 200 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.001 million t per square kilometre 0.0005 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre 0.0003 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Norway?
Mauritius, at 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Norway?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 115th and Norway ranks 117th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Norway: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/norway/">Mauritius vs Norway: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.