Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0014 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0013 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
115th
Sri Lanka rank
118th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sri Lanka
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 115th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 200 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
Mauritius, at 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0013 million t per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 115th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/">Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.