Mauritius vs Tonga: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0014 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0.0014 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
115th
Tonga rank
116th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tonga
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0014 million t per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 116th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0.0014 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Tonga?
Mauritius, at 0.0014 million t per square kilometre against 0.0014 million t per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Tonga?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tonga?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Tonga rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 116th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tonga: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tonga/">Mauritius vs Tonga: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.