New Caledonia vs Serbia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0041 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0041 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
50th
Serbia rank
47th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Serbia
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0041 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 47th of 200 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0039 million t per square kilometre 0.0028 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0007 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0041 million t per square kilometre 0.004 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.0041 million t per square kilometre against 0.0041 million t per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Serbia?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Serbia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/serbia/">New Caledonia vs Serbia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.