Panama vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Panama
0.0053 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.0053 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
35th
East Timor rank
34th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • East Timor
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.0053 million t per square kilometre against 0.0053 million t per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 35th and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0056 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.0054 million t per square kilometre 0.0055 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.0053 million t per square kilometre 0.0054 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0053 million t per square kilometre 0.0053 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Panama or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.0053 million t per square kilometre against 0.0053 million t per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Panama and East Timor?
0 million t per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and East Timor?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Panama and East Timor rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 35th and East Timor ranks 34th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/">Panama vs East Timor: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.