Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
0.0083 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0082 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
17th
Slovenia rank
19th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Slovenia
00.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0083 million t per square kilometre against 0.0082 million t per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 19th of 200 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0085 million t per square kilometre 0.0066 million t per square kilometre 0.0018 million t per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0084 million t per square kilometre 0.0078 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0084 million t per square kilometre 0.0083 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0083 million t per square kilometre 0.0082 million t per square kilometre 0.0002 million t per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Slovenia?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0083 million t per square kilometre against 0.0082 million t per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 19th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/slovenia/">Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.