Rwanda vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Rwanda
0.0031 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0033 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
69th
Sweden rank
66th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sweden
00.0010.0020.003199020062023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 66th of 200 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0017 million t per square kilometre 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0012 million t per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0018 million t per square kilometre 0.003 million t per square kilometre 0.0013 million t per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0021 million t per square kilometre 0.0032 million t per square kilometre 0.0011 million t per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0033 million t per square kilometre 0.0004 million t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Rwanda or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Rwanda and Sweden?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sweden/">Rwanda vs Sweden: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.