Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Rwanda
0.0031 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0017 million t per square kilometre | 0.0038 million t per square kilometre | 0.0021 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0018 million t per square kilometre | 0.0035 million t per square kilometre | 0.0018 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0021 million t per square kilometre | 0.0033 million t per square kilometre | 0.0012 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0029 million t per square kilometre | 0.0033 million t per square kilometre | 0.0004 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0032 million t per square kilometre against 0.0031 million t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
- Rwanda ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.