Solomon Islands vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
0.0163 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0161 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
3rd
Suriname rank
4th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Suriname
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0163 million t per square kilometre against 0.0161 million t per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0002 million t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 4th of 200 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0164 million t per square kilometre 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0162 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0161 million t per square kilometre 0.0001 million t per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or Suriname?
Solomon Islands, at 0.0163 million t per square kilometre against 0.0161 million t per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and Suriname?
0.0002 million t per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and Suriname rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 4th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/suriname/">Solomon Islands vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.