South Sudan vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

South Sudan
0.0006 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0006 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
152nd
Uruguay rank
151st

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • South Sudan
  • Uruguay
0000.001199020062023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0006 million t per square kilometre against 0.0006 million t per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 million t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 152nd and Uruguay ranks 151st of 200 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Uruguay Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0.0006 million t per square kilometre 0 million t per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, South Sudan or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0006 million t per square kilometre against 0.0006 million t per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between South Sudan and Uruguay?
0 million t per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Uruguay?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
South Sudan ranks 152nd and Uruguay ranks 151st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/uruguay/">South Sudan vs Uruguay: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.