Sub-Saharan Africa vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0024 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0161 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd
Suriname rank
4th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Suriname
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0161 million t per square kilometre against 0.0024 million t per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0137 million t per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 6.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 4th of 2 groups.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.003 million t per square kilometre 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0133 million t per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0029 million t per square kilometre 0.0163 million t per square kilometre 0.0134 million t per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0025 million t per square kilometre 0.0162 million t per square kilometre 0.0137 million t per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0024 million t per square kilometre 0.0161 million t per square kilometre 0.0138 million t per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0161 million t per square kilometre against 0.0024 million t per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname?
0.0137 million t per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Suriname rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 4th of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/suriname/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Suriname: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Unit
million t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,712 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.