Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre
Sweden
0.0033 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre over time
- Sweden
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0032 million t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 million t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0029 million t per square kilometre | 0.0038 million t per square kilometre | 0.0009 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.003 million t per square kilometre | 0.0035 million t per square kilometre | 0.0005 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0032 million t per square kilometre | 0.0033 million t per square kilometre | 0.0002 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0033 million t per square kilometre | 0.0033 million t per square kilometre | 0 million t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
- Sweden, at 0.0033 million t per square kilometre against 0.0032 million t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0001 million t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre?
- Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.