Ethiopia vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP

Ethiopia
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Namibia
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
30th
Namibia rank
27th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Namibia
00000199020072025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 million t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 27th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2000s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2010s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2020s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp, Ethiopia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp between Ethiopia and Namibia?
0 million t per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Namibia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and Namibia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp?
Ethiopia ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 27th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-unit-of-gdp/ethiopia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-unit-of-gdp/ethiopia/namibia/">Ethiopia vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP
Unit
million t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 6,886 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.