Panama vs Sudan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP
Panama
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sudan
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Panama rank
70th
Sudan rank
71st
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP over time
- Panama
- Sudan
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 million t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 71st of 197 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2020s | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | 0 million t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp, Panama or Sudan?
- Panama, at 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp between Panama and Sudan?
- 0 million t per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Panama and Sudan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp?
- Panama ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 71st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.