Peru vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP

Peru
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 million t per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Peru rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP over time

  • Peru
  • Zimbabwe
0000199020072025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Peru, a difference of 0 million t per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Peru
2000s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP 0 million t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp, Peru or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 million t per US$ of GDP against 0 million t per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp between Peru and Zimbabwe?
0 million t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of gdp?
Peru ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per unit of GDP
Unit
million t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 6,886 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.