Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Montserrat: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.1902 million t
in 2025
Montserrat
0.1607 million t
in 2025
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
198th
Montserrat rank
200th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Montserrat
00.050.10.150.20.25199020072025

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.1902 million t against 0.1607 million t in Montserrat, a difference of 0.0295 million t.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 1.2 times Montserrat's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Montserrat ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Montserrat ranks 200th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 3 and Montserrat in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Montserrat Difference Ahead
1990s 0.19 million t 0.2027 million t 0.0127 million t Montserrat
2000s 0.19 million t 0.161 million t 0.0291 million t Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.19 million t 0.1618 million t 0.0283 million t Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.1901 million t 0.1605 million t 0.0295 million t Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Montserrat?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.1902 million t against 0.1607 million t in Montserrat as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Montserrat?
0.0295 million t, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Montserrat?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Montserrat rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 198th and Montserrat ranks 200th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Montserrat: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/montserrat/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/montserrat/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Montserrat: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 9,484 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.