Australia and New Zealand vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Australia and New Zealand
11,290 million t
in 2025
China
10,126 million t
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
China rank
7th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • China
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020072025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11,290 million t against 10,126 million t in China, a difference of 1,164 million t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and China ranks 7th of 215 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand China Difference Ahead
1990s 11,284 million t 5,428 million t 5,857 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 11,202 million t 6,364 million t 4,838 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 11,201 million t 7,774 million t 3,427 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 11,274 million t 9,554 million t 1,720 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Australia and New Zealand or China?
Australia and New Zealand, at 11,290 million t against 10,126 million t in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Australia and New Zealand and China?
1,164 million t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and China?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and China rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and China ranks 7th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/australia-and-new-zealand/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/australia-and-new-zealand/china/">Australia and New Zealand vs China: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 9,484 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.