Australia vs China, mainland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Australia
9,759 million t
in 2025
China, mainland
10,126 million t
in 2025
Australia rank
12th
China, mainland rank
10th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Australia
  • China, mainland
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199020072025

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 10,126 million t against 9,759 million t in Australia, a difference of 367 million t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 12th and China, mainland ranks 10th of 249 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia China, mainland Difference Ahead
1990s 9,904 million t 5,428 million t 4,477 million t Australia
2000s 9,765 million t 6,364 million t 3,401 million t Australia
2010s 9,707 million t 7,774 million t 1,933 million t Australia
2020s 9,749 million t 9,554 million t 195.46 million t Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Australia or China, mainland?
China, mainland, at 10,126 million t against 9,759 million t in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Australia and China, mainland?
367 million t, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China, mainland?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and China, mainland rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Australia ranks 12th and China, mainland ranks 10th of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs China, mainland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/australia/china-mainland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/australia/china-mainland/">Australia vs China, mainland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
281 places, 9,788 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.