Belarus vs Laos: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time
- Belarus
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 993.34 million t against 975.8 million t in Belarus, a difference of 17.54 million t.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 51st and Laos ranks 49th of 249 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 468.95 million t | 897.9 million t | 428.95 million t | Laos |
| 2000s | 595.11 million t | 965.41 million t | 370.3 million t | Laos |
| 2010s | 714.67 million t | 1,038 million t | 323.44 million t | Laos |
| 2020s | 875.93 million t | 1,000 million t | 124.14 million t | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Belarus or Laos?
- Laos, at 993.34 million t against 975.8 million t in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Belarus and Laos?
- 17.54 million t, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Laos?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Laos rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
- Belarus ranks 51st and Laos ranks 49th of 249 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.