Chile vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Chile
2,390 million t
in 2025
Micronesia (Federated States of)
7.62 million t
in 2025
Chile rank
21st
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
20th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Chile
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020072025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2,390 million t against 7.62 million t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 2,382 million t.

That makes Chile's figure about 313.6 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 20th of 215 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
1990s 2,294 million t 7.52 million t 2,286 million t Chile
2000s 2,346 million t 7.55 million t 2,338 million t Chile
2010s 2,391 million t 7.58 million t 2,384 million t Chile
2020s 2,391 million t 7.61 million t 2,384 million t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Chile or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Chile, at 2,390 million t against 7.62 million t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Chile and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
2,382 million t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Chile and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Chile ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/chile/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/chile/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Chile vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 9,484 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.