Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Democratic Republic of the Congo
20,766 million t
in 2025
Russian Federation
44,584 million t
in 2025
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th
Russian Federation rank
3rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Russian Federation
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020072025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 44,584 million t against 20,766 million t in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 23,818 million t.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 21 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 23,397 million t 36,111 million t 12,714 million t Russian Federation
2000s 22,491 million t 38,837 million t 16,346 million t Russian Federation
2010s 21,370 million t 41,706 million t 20,335 million t Russian Federation
2020s 20,871 million t 43,800 million t 22,929 million t Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 44,584 million t against 20,766 million t in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
23,818 million t, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 21 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 9,484 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.