Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass

Sweden
1,325 million t
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1,243 million t
in 2025
Sweden rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
43rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k199020072025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1,325 million t against 1,243 million t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 82 million t.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sweden ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 249 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,163 million t 1,467 million t 303.8 million t Zimbabwe
2000s 1,226 million t 1,371 million t 144.78 million t Zimbabwe
2010s 1,301 million t 1,295 million t 5.95 million t Sweden
2020s 1,325 million t 1,255 million t 69.83 million t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Sweden, at 1,325 million t against 1,243 million t in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
82 million t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass?
Sweden ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass
Unit
million t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
281 places, 9,788 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.