Austria vs Kenya: Forestland — Area — FAO TIER 1
Austria
3,904 1000 ha
in 2025
Kenya
3,914 1000 ha
in 2025
Austria rank
82nd
Kenya rank
81st
Forestland — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Austria
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 3,914 1000 ha against 3,904 1000 ha in Austria, a difference of 10 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 82nd and Kenya ranks 81st of 239 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,804 1000 ha | 3,775 1000 ha | 29.16 1000 ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 3,849 1000 ha | 3,844 1000 ha | 4.49 1000 ha | Austria |
| 2010s | 3,874 1000 ha | 3,574 1000 ha | 300.55 1000 ha | Austria |
| 2020s | 3,897 1000 ha | 3,753 1000 ha | 144.23 1000 ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area — fao tier 1, Austria or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 3,914 1000 ha against 3,904 1000 ha in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area — fao tier 1 between Austria and Kenya?
- 10 1000 ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kenya?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Kenya rank globally for forestland — area — fao tier 1?
- Austria ranks 82nd and Kenya ranks 81st of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).