Lebanon vs Réunion: Forestland — Area
Lebanon
141.32 1000 ha
in 2025
Réunion
77.15 1000 ha
in 2025
Lebanon rank
154th
Réunion rank
156th
Forestland — Area over time
- Lebanon
- Réunion
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 141.32 1000 ha against 77.15 1000 ha in Réunion, a difference of 64.17 1000 ha.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.8 times Réunion's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 154th and Réunion ranks 156th of 223 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 138.36 1000 ha | 69.31 1000 ha | 69.05 1000 ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 139.33 1000 ha | 72.33 1000 ha | 67 1000 ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 140.31 1000 ha | 75.64 1000 ha | 64.67 1000 ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 141.08 1000 ha | 77.11 1000 ha | 63.97 1000 ha | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, Lebanon or Réunion?
- Lebanon, at 141.32 1000 ha against 77.15 1000 ha in Réunion as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area between Lebanon and Réunion?
- 64.17 1000 ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Réunion?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lebanon and Réunion rank globally for forestland — area?
- Lebanon ranks 154th and Réunion ranks 156th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).