Poland vs Senegal: Forestland — Area
Poland
9,495 1000 ha
in 2025
Senegal
8,649 1000 ha
in 2025
Poland rank
50th
Senegal rank
53rd
Forestland — Area over time
- Poland
- Senegal
How they compare
Poland currently reports 9,495 1000 ha against 8,649 1000 ha in Senegal, a difference of 846 1000 ha.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Senegal ahead.
Poland ranks 50th and Senegal ranks 53rd of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,962 1000 ha | 9,123 1000 ha | 161.76 1000 ha | Senegal |
| 2000s | 9,180 1000 ha | 8,968 1000 ha | 212.54 1000 ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 9,402 1000 ha | 8,813 1000 ha | 589.03 1000 ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 9,480 1000 ha | 8,688 1000 ha | 791.43 1000 ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, Poland or Senegal?
- Poland, at 9,495 1000 ha against 8,649 1000 ha in Senegal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area between Poland and Senegal?
- 846 1000 ha, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Senegal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Senegal rank globally for forestland — area?
- Poland ranks 50th and Senegal ranks 53rd of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).