Cambodia vs Eswatini: Forestland — Area, per capita
Cambodia
0.0004 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Eswatini
0.0003 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Cambodia rank
74th
Eswatini rank
76th
Forestland — Area, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0004 1000 ha per person against 0.0003 1000 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 1000 ha per person | 0.0005 1000 ha per person | 0.0007 1000 ha per person | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.0008 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.0006 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per capita, Cambodia or Eswatini?
- Cambodia, at 0.0004 1000 ha per person against 0.0003 1000 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per capita between Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 0.0001 1000 ha per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Eswatini rank globally for forestland — area, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.