Guam vs Kazakhstan: Forestland — Area, per capita
Guam
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Guam rank
115th
Kazakhstan rank
113th
Forestland — Area, per capita over time
- Guam
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Guam, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 115th and Kazakhstan ranks 113th of 191 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per capita, Guam or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per capita between Guam and Kazakhstan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Kazakhstan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Guam and Kazakhstan rank globally for forestland — area, per capita?
- Guam ranks 115th and Kazakhstan ranks 113th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.