Latvia vs Montenegro: Forestland — Area, per capita
Latvia
0.0019 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Montenegro
0.0013 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
26th
Montenegro rank
29th
Forestland — Area, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0019 1000 ha per person against 0.0013 1000 ha per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0006 1000 ha per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Montenegro's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 26th and Montenegro ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 1000 ha per person | 0.0013 1000 ha per person | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0017 1000 ha per person | 0.0013 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0018 1000 ha per person | 0.0013 1000 ha per person | 0.0005 1000 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per capita, Latvia or Montenegro?
- Latvia, at 0.0019 1000 ha per person against 0.0013 1000 ha per person in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per capita between Latvia and Montenegro?
- 0.0006 1000 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for forestland — area, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 26th and Montenegro ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.