Afghanistan vs Latvia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
63rd
Latvia rank
60th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 60th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Latvia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 60th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.