Angola vs Namibia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Angola
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Namibia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Angola rank
18th
Namibia rank
17th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Angola
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 17th of 187 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Angola or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Angola and Namibia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Namibia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Namibia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 17th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.