Chile vs Estonia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Estonia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chile rank
74th
Estonia rank
72nd
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Chile ranks 74th and Estonia ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Estonia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 74th and Estonia ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.