China vs Tunisia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
China
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tunisia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
China rank
124th
Tunisia rank
123rd
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, China or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between China and Tunisia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tunisia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Tunisia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.