Eritrea vs Mongolia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Mongolia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eritrea rank
13th
Mongolia rank
16th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 187 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Mongolia?
- Eritrea, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Mongolia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Mongolia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.