Finland vs Latvia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Finland
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Finland rank
61st
Latvia rank
60th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Finland, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 60th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Finland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Finland and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Finland ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 60th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.