Ireland vs Luxembourg: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Ireland
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Luxembourg
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ireland rank
162nd
Luxembourg rank
165th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Ireland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 162nd and Luxembourg ranks 165th of 187 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Ireland or Luxembourg?
- Ireland, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ireland and Luxembourg rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Ireland ranks 162nd and Luxembourg ranks 165th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.