Malawi vs Nepal: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Malawi
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nepal
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Malawi rank
41st
Nepal rank
40th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.
Malawi ranks 41st and Nepal ranks 40th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Malawi or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Malawi and Nepal?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Malawi ranks 41st and Nepal ranks 40th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.