Mexico vs Serbia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Mexico
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Serbia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mexico rank
83rd
Serbia rank
84th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Mexico
- Serbia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Mexico ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Mexico or Serbia?
- Mexico, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Mexico and Serbia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Serbia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Mexico ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.