Rwanda vs Serbia: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Serbia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda rank
81st
Serbia rank
84th
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 84th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.