Serbia vs Uganda: Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP
Serbia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Uganda
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Serbia rank
84th
Uganda rank
82nd
Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Serbia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — area, per unit of gdp, Serbia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — area, per unit of gdp between Serbia and Uganda?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uganda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Uganda rank globally for forestland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Serbia ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forestland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forestland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.