Armenia vs Iraq: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Iraq
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -491.33 kt against -784.34 kt in Iraq, a difference of 293.01 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 147th and Iraq ranks 150th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.83 kt | -183.33 kt | 275.17 kt | Armenia |
| 2000s | 89.39 kt | -9.13 kt | 98.51 kt | Armenia |
| 2010s | -588.61 kt | 3,273 kt | 3,862 kt | Iraq |
| 2020s | -686.95 kt | 1,856 kt | 2,543 kt | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Armenia or Iraq?
- Armenia, at -491.33 kt against -784.34 kt in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Armenia and Iraq?
- 293.01 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Iraq rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 147th and Iraq ranks 150th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf