Belgium vs Kyrgyzstan: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belgium ranks 37th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 37th of 218 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -3,421 kt | -85.43 kt | 3,336 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | -2,141 kt | -2,091 kt | 49.98 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 383.64 kt | -1,090 kt | 1,474 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Belgium or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 37th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 37th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf