Bhutan vs Dominica: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Bhutan
- Dominica
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.26 kt against 2.22 kt in Dominica, a difference of 0.04 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Dominica ahead.
Bhutan ranks 29th and Dominica ranks 30th of 218 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -4,261 kt | 2.07 kt | 4,263 kt | Dominica |
| 2000s | -4,264 kt | -0.8822 kt | 4,263 kt | Dominica |
| 2010s | -919.23 kt | 0.8782 kt | 920.11 kt | Dominica |
| 2020s | -40.47 kt | 1.99 kt | 42.46 kt | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Bhutan or Dominica?
- Bhutan, at 2.26 kt against 2.22 kt in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Bhutan and Dominica?
- 0.04 kt, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Dominica?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Dominica rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Bhutan ranks 29th and Dominica ranks 30th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf