Congo vs Turkey: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports -6,908 kt against -7,590 kt in Congo, a difference of 682 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 212th and Turkey ranks 210th of 252 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | -16,944 kt | 16,944 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 kt | -40,360 kt | 40,360 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | -1.99 kt | -30,040 kt | 30,038 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | -5,693 kt | -2,624 kt | 3,069 kt | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Congo or Turkey?
- Turkey, at -6,908 kt against -7,590 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Congo and Turkey?
- 682 kt, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Turkey?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Turkey rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Congo ranks 212th and Turkey ranks 210th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf