Jordan vs Namibia: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Jordan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports -0.418 kt against -0.502 kt in Jordan, a difference of 0.084 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Jordan ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 94th of 234 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 2.14 kt | 2.14 kt | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | -3.6 kt | 3.6 kt | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 2.01 kt | 2.01 kt | Namibia |
| 2020s | -0.3765 kt | 1.34 kt | 1.72 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Jordan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at -0.418 kt against -0.502 kt in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Jordan and Namibia?
- 0.084 kt, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Namibia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Namibia rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Jordan ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 94th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf