Latvia vs Mali: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1,364 kt against 990.73 kt in Mali, a difference of 373.27 kt.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mali ahead.
Latvia ranks 12th and Mali ranks 14th of 252 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -14,975 kt | 53.6 kt | 15,028 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | -16,070 kt | -17.21 kt | 16,053 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | -12,580 kt | 673.31 kt | 13,254 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | -2,094 kt | 975.45 kt | 3,069 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Latvia or Mali?
- Latvia, at 1,364 kt against 990.73 kt in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Latvia and Mali?
- 373.27 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 12th and Mali ranks 14th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf