Monaco vs Mongolia: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Monaco
- Mongolia
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 39th of 234 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | -1.22 kt | 1.22 kt | Monaco |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.2656 kt | 0.2656 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | -66.44 kt | 66.44 kt | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0 kt | -43.26 kt | 43.26 kt | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Monaco or Mongolia?
- Monaco, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Monaco and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Monaco and Mongolia rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Monaco ranks 39th and Mongolia ranks 39th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf