Mongolia vs Montenegro: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 37th and Montenegro ranks 37th of 218 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4305 kt | -6,847 kt | 6,847 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -66.44 kt | -684.67 kt | 618.24 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | -43.26 kt | 0 kt | 43.26 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Mongolia or Montenegro?
- Mongolia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Mongolia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Montenegro rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 37th and Montenegro ranks 37th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf